Going back to my original question (cautiously <g>), I did pick up this info this morning (12/15 for a VFP 9 release date):

http://blogs.msdn.com/acoat/


>I'm not a PUTM, so I can't search.
>
>As for the NDA, I agree...statements can be made that would violate it, but as I said, I would do everything I could to verify if the bug has been fixed.
>
>>Well, you weren't originally belittling me and I was happy with what you contributed until you started in on the "whining" thing. That's just not conducive to discussion in any forum (that word is big in political discourse these days and, IMHO, it's one of the reasons the country is so polarized at the moment). But that aside, I don't think you have been reading these posts very well, because your statements about what I've said are simply not accurate. The conversation went off on other issues and if I mentioned the letter again, then you will see, if you read the posts, that I was responding to a question.
>>
>>Search on downloads, last name Campbell, one of the main bugs I'm dealing with right now is detailed in that form (should be the only item in the results list). With all the other stuff taking place here, I did not have a chance to mention that I did talk with a beta tester about this bug and he gave a very vague response that may have indicated it was fixed, but it was so vague I was left wondering. I felt he did not want to break the NDA and I did not want to pressure him to do that, so I dropped it.
>>