>>But if I understand well, the original problem was that the appended records weren't processed at all. That'd be better solved with what Sergey proposed, to save the current record's recno() before inserting, and GoTo it afterwards.
>
>Dragan,
>
>Unless there is an order set.

Of course. The underlying assumption was that the newly inserted records should be encountered after the old records. With an active tag, all bets are off.