Hey Hugo,

actually I was preparing an answer to Soykan yesterday with a solution to his question, and a final note very similar to the comment from Cecil. But I had to leave my office for a few hours, and when I came back a solution was already posted.

Of course it's totally up to Soykan. But I think it's also polite of us to warn him against spending too much time on what may seem like a good idea, but which in the end may scare his potential customers. I can tell you that if someone would try to show a program to potential customers here in Norway with exploding windows, people will think that this is a bad program with outdated visual effects to compensate for a bad program, and will not bother to take a closer look at the program. I have actually seen this happen more than once. People want a program to do it's job, without any extra bells ans whistles.

>Well, I strongly disagree with Cetin's answer. Not because I like or dislike zooming windows, but because it was not the question asked, and it is not up to us to decide what others want to do. If the question had been "Should I zoom windows?" then the answer is appropiate (but even then I think it deserves more details as for why not doing it), but it wasn't.
>
>I did not wanted to bring this up, I really appreciate Cetin as one of the best collaborators here in UT, and his answer might've sound harsh to me for neither of us are native english speakers, or it might be he is a friend of Soykan, but as posts of support for an answer I do not feel appropiate "pile up", I felt the urge of giving my point of view. <g>