>>Hi George.I think its very simple really. The current Personality of the Year survey is being done. Given sufficiently large participation I would guess that the top X (UT to decide how many) members voted for are probably worthy of a PUTM. The UT can always review the top X candidates against their contributions as an added confirmation. This creates an added motivation perhaps to valued contributors and recognizes their efforts in helping this community.
>>
>>My main point is that, imo, the granting of a PUTM should have nothing to do with MS MVP status - I think many members have no interest in MVP status whatsoever yet contribute an enormous value to our community.
>
>Thanks for supporting me Josh.

"Never has so much been destroyed by so few with so little" - Vinston Churchill

<g>