>Hi Fabio,
>
>It is much easier to criticize the tool and complain that it doesn't fit your vision of the world than to learn how does it work and how to use it properly, isn't it?
>
>Thanks,
>Aleksey.
>

Hi Aleksey,
this is not true!
This is one your distorted vision.
During these months on UT I have inasmuch as you always stretch to diminish any thing,
then I I am forced to emphasize it.

I don't criticize the tool, not to forget it: "I use this tool".

I put on the table of the issues;
if you are kind one and say to me as they are the things,
I can adapt myself,
BUT, not to attack itself on the plan of the personal acquaintances,
is a way easy in order to remove the problems from the table.

For this specific situation:
"how many developers know that direct table workarea have cached data
and that this data they can be does not align also between sessions of the same process?
or between workareas of the same session ? ( i have not checked this last condition )"
I task : VFPT members and I.

Since it is possible to implement a management of the cache that he does not have these problems,
I thought that VFP do this and managed cache to level of file handle (one single file cache of process).
Now they are to acquaintance of the fact that the cache is to level of workarea,
and that (what that I supposed)
VFP internally does not have mechanisms that guarantee the coherence between the several
workareas caches.
Enough to know it.
Turns out you that it is documented?

Aleksey, this our argument, you could formalize it better,
and to explain the all in a FAQ of UT.
Task that you would make an optimal service who uses VFP.

Hi
Fabio