>>>>>><snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>... For instance I think DenisC should get a PUTM for life because of his enormous contribution furthering the VFP line <g> Seriously there are many great contributers here, many are not MVP.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I got so thrilled by reading your reply Josh. I even seriously considered putting you in my top 10 list of virtual friends. That is until I read SERIOUSLY.
>>>>>
>>>>>No, no, no. You give me no credit. The comma after "seriously" was meant to be a full stop! I was being serious.
>>>>
>>>>No comma noticed and now I'm really confused! What IS your standpoint about DenisC's contributions?
>>>
>>>Yup. There was meant to be a comma which for Denis was meant to be read as a full stop. Why ARE you asking about my standpoint on DenisC's contributions?
>>
>>Well, it IS a public thread, isn't it? And I am still wondering how you meant it. It may be my lack of understanding of English grammar, of course.
>
>I think DenisC is a great guy with a great sense of humour. Happy?


Hmmmm I'm wondering if you really meant what you just wrote. It's the happy at the end that gets to me.

I would have interpreted this in a completely different way without the happy. It's weird that in certain circumstances a nice word like "happy" could be given a meaning completely opposed to its real meaning. At least you did'nt shout it out.

;-)

But I guess that we'll never know if what you wrote is really what you think of me.

There's no way out of this. Too bad. We can blame this on the internet way of exchanging messages.