Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Custom Report Length
Message
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Reports & Report designer
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00969150
Message ID:
00969268
Views:
9
Yeah, it's hard to believe! But, I called the company that prints the forms this morning and they confirmed the form length is 7 1/3".

How and why they ended up with that size? No one seems to know.

Anyway, the client is going to dump all the remaining to the local recycle effort and re-order at 7.25" They agree their employees time/frustration is worth the cost.

I've been developing custom forms for at least 20 years and I usually determine the size requirements. This is the first and last time I let the customer do it without my advance approval. :)



>Dale,
>It is hard to imagine that the forms are actually 7 1/3 inches long. Have you tried to measure the form (or mesure 10 forms and divide by 10)? You might find out that 3 decimals is accurate enough.
>Just my $0.02.
>
>Einar (who is a big fan of the metric system :) )
>
>
>
>>Thanks Sergey.
>>
>>It solved my problem by allowing me to tack on an additional 0.003 (approx.)
>>
>>They still might have to make a small adjustment every 100 or so, but this should make them happy until they run out of forms. At that time I'll try to get them to switch to 7.25" or 7.5".
>>
>>It's still hard for me to believe someone would develope a form that has a length of 7.333...3
>>
>>
>>>Dale,
>>>
>>>Take a look at Re: Form Length Problem Thread #954391 Message #954407. It also may be a printer driver problem.
>>>
>>>>I have a client that has thousands of preprinted billing forms (tractor feed)that have a length of 7.33333 (7 1/3").
>>>>
>>>>In setting up the custom form, Windows limitations are 2 decimal places. So, as the forms feed through the printer the vertical alignment creeps off .003 per form. When it gets bad enough, the user has to pause the printer, readjust and restart.....and you know who's getting the blame.
>>>>
>>>>Is there any known work-around to get an extra decimal place of accuracy in this situation?
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform