>PS: No matter what I say, in my code (especially the ones posted here) there is scope and type identifiers. Not for I like them but becasue majority of users seem to understand and use them better vs the ones w/o those prefixes.

Interesting point. I'll bet even if all editors and writers of FoxPro Advisor and FoxTalk are convinced that throwing away the redundant prefix is a good thing, the existing convention will still be followed in all the code published. <g>

Ben