>>>>>><snip>
>>>>>>My point is still that the PUTM offer and MVP status, imo, should not be linked per se. For instance I think DenisC should get a PUTM for life because of his enormous contribution furthering the VFP line <g> Seriously there are many great contributers here, many are not MVP.
>>>>>
>>>>>Hi Jos,
>>>>>
>>>>>In thinking about this, I remembered some history.
>>>>>
>>>>>It may not be strictly a decision by Michel, but one that is supplemented by MS. I don't know for certain, but it is a distinct possibility.
>>>>
>>>>Hi George,
>>>>
>>>>If that is the case then UT should say so.
>>>
>>>I don't get it. Why should the UT say it if it's the case?
>>
>>You're right that they dont have to. But if that is the case then why keep it secret? If free PUTM's are being given for MVP status then say so simply because then everyone understands the rules of the "game", so to speak. If this is the case, that is. Not that I care btw :)
>
>I guess that's what happens when I don't read everything in a thread. I thought that this MVP free PUTM had been clarified already. If PUTM are given to MVPs I'd also say that it should be stated clearly. I don't see a reason to not say it.
>
>But the UT is not my business and I'd be highly suprised if I became an MVP any time soon. Even with your support <g>
>
>So in the end I don't really care about the outcome over this topic.

I agree with you Denis.