Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Eof() or found()
Message
De
17/12/2004 20:53:38
Hilmar Zonneveld
Independent Consultant
Cochabamba, Bolivie
 
 
À
17/12/2004 20:08:50
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Codage, syntaxe et commandes
Versions des environnements
Visual FoxPro:
VFP 8 SP1
OS:
Windows 2000 SP4
Network:
Windows 2000 Pro
Database:
Visual FoxPro
Divers
Thread ID:
00970039
Message ID:
00970266
Vues:
20
>>I would agree with most of the others here and say that FOUND() is the better choice. >SET NEAR ON can break the use of EOF() whereas FOUND() will always be accurate.
>
>Jim
>Do you mean to say that if "Set Near" is set ON and if you are trying to seek partial variable, "If not eof()" will be .T. but found() will be .F. ???
>Shafid

The whole idea of SET NEAR is that if an exact match is not found, the closest matching record will be selected. Therefore, EOF will NOT be true.
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform