>Hilmar:
>
>Thank you for your reply. I know that you are not in favor of the General Field. I read a lot of your comment about that. But I only use one record in that table so is not big deal the size of the file. An VFP report does not give me more choices, I need to display a RTF file and the General field give me that in the report. If Win 98 does not supported and I will need a program like Microsoft Word to display that RTF file, well the user have to buy that.
>
>But I know that somebody out there know how to do that.
I am not opposed to using General fields temporarily, for reports. But in that case, there is no need to get the information out again (i.e., as a file).
On the other hand, there ARE alternatives in VFP reports. Basically, IIRC, you can set the "filename" to a FIELD which contains the filename.
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
