I see. Thanks Robert.
I found it 'odd' because I understand "snapshot" to mean any picture showing something at an instant in time whether it was moving or not. As opposed to a video or a movie.
I will add your qualification to my internal dictionary.
cheers
>Hi Jim!
>
>With "absolutely not suitable for snap-shots" I mean that when "shooting" a moving object the result isn't sharp due to the long "reaction-time" (= from pushing the button to taking the picture - I don't now the right word for his).
>
>Images of non-moving objects are brilliant, you can "turn it" for best positioning and it's small and reliable - but for snap-shots too slow.
>
>>Hi Robert,
>>
>>Not an answer for you, but a question...
>>
>>If the camera is "absolutely not suitable for snap-shots" then what makes it a "... great cam..."?
>>
>>cheers
>>
>>
>>>Hi all!
>>>
>>>I'm planning to buy a new digicam - a "Ricoh Caplio R1" - and would be interested in experience reports.
>>>Now I have a "Nikon Coolpix 2500" ... great cam but a little bit slow and absolutely not suitable for snap-shots.
>>>
>>>Google provides lots of reports but I prefer real-time experiences.
>>>
>>>Thanks!!!
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only