Where were you for the public beta? There were innumerable people beta testing VFP9, and the feedback sent back to the team was the best I had ever seen. However, no pool of test sites can possibly test for everything and every conceivable way VFP is used. The team relies on good repro code. I understand your frustration, but ranting now, instead of providing repro code is not very helpful.

>Geeeeeeeez..... and this is supposed to be a stable release?
>
>Getting COM Server crashes with bogus "Memo file is missing or is invalid" error messages during a REPLACE in a VFP9 DBC Stored Proc.
>
>This stuff has been working flawlessly in VFP8 for months. There are other problems I don't have time to write about.
>
>What really makes me mad about all of this is that there are new features in VFP9 that we really need. But all this other garbage prevents us from using VFP9 until a service pack is released which may or may not address the issues I have found in JUST A FEW HOURS!!!
>
>I feel like asking for our money back. MERRY XMAS