Hi Aleksey,

Thanks for clarification. I think help for error 2066 has to be expanded to cover that.

>
>Unfortunately, it is applicable to VFP9. We were not able to find a solution with acceptable performance characteristics. Instead of significantly slowing down things across-the-board, we added new tools for developers to better handle tables modified with very high frequency:
>- new values for the second parameter of SET REFRESH
>- SYS(1104) is enhanced to target specific work area
>- a work area can be assigned its own refresh setting
>
>Thanks,
>Aleksey.
>
>
>>Hi Aleksey,
>>
>>The VFP9 help for error 2066 states only that "The index file you are attempting to use is corrupted. Use the INDEX Command to rebuild it". Does it mean that this problem has been addressed/fixed in VFP9 and info you provided in the thread #810798 isn't applicable to VFP9 anymore ?
>>
>>>
>>>Take a look into thread #810798.
>>>