Well, if that's essentially all that sollock is doing, then it may prove to be an efficient anti-refox method and that would leave only the better/best crackers in the arena!
And if the makers of refox would decide to modify refox in a way that it also tackles the sollock-protection, then they would be doing some really illegal work, imo.
>Refox is only going to decompile an exe that it "understands" - which is a basic straight forward compiled VFP exe. It cannot decompile an exe which has been modified in a way that it does not recognize anymore. However, just because Refox cannot decompile it does not mean you have any protection per se. It just means you have protection from Refox.
>
>>Good morning,
>>
>>did you have the opportunity to test it against refox?
>>
>>I'm just curios.
>>
>>
>>
>>>Interesting...
>>>Wonder what this is in English..
>>>
Sollock - Programa para Proteger Exe , contra decompiladores
>>>
>>>Tan simple de usar como ejecutarlo , buscar el .exe a proteger y darle a Bloquear , aparece un mensaje de Bloqueado y pulsar Salir , ya esta. Esta escrito en VFP 7.0 y protegido con el propio programa , asi podreis comprobar si es o no eficaz. Evidentemente para que funcione correctamente necesitais tener las librerias de VFP 7.0>>>
>>>>I found and application named sollock programmed by a VFP programmer from Spain (I think) here is the site
http://www.solges.net/ I downloaded it but I don’t have refox to test it against. It Is free so maybe some of you can test it.
>>>[snip]
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
