>Hi Fabio,
>
>first of all, documented behavior is not a bug...! But, I also agree that it is not logical to let different field types give the same return value when it should be easy to give different values.
>
>My guess is that since TYPE() and VARTYPE() mostly is used to check memory variables and properties, and not fields, it was low priority. Personally I ALWAYS use AFIELDS() for fields, I even wrote a FIELDTYPE() function many years ago, as a part of my standard function library.
>
Well,
then try to use the FoxPro.h T_VARCHAR definition with AFIELDS().
Fabio
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only