>Cetin,
>
>This select takes very long time if there are many records returned.
>set filter works much faster since it will not scan whole table.
>Also this does not change base table.
>I want to edit data in large table where records are filtered
>by an arbitrary (rusmore optimizable because there are some indexes) condition.
>I want to edit filtered records in a grid.
>
Well Andrus. OK but is there something new with "set filter" that I don't know. Set filter works much faster than SQL select ? I always thought it was not the case. I should check this again and if true thanks for warning about it.
Cetin