>>Proactive level of integrity?
>
>You must be kidding. Right? You don't proactively try to have interity in the work you do? That might say a lot right there.

I Always do the best I can in the work I do. The problem with "Proactive level of integrity" is that it's not worth much if a link is broken early in the chain. No matter how hard I try to do the best applications. If users screw it on purpose I can't do much about that. I mean if they don't enter the correct information the application is worthless.


>>You must be very young, or live in a country where no corruption ever occured to still believe in that nice sentence.
>
>I'm old and live in the US, so you would be wrong on both counts. If you do not adhere to the concept of proactive integrety, then you wouldn't understand that it's not a "nice" sentence, but one of personal conviction.
>
>>As soon as there is money involved somewhere I don't give much chance to a "Proactive level of integrity"
>
Again, you must be kidding. You do less than your best just because there is money involved?

I mean even if my application is the best if the user has a friend that built a supposedly complete application that resolve their problem the user will probably pick the friend's application. That already happened to me and I'm sure it'll happen again.