>>Yes, it is an interesting article. I didn't see any typos though - except for not fully capitalizing the "ARA" acronym. Maybe they cleaned it up?
>
>Not sure. When I read it, I came across one sentence that had "was" instead of "is" and another where a word was omitted.
>
>It seems that I'm alone in this though. I'm surprised that people don't hold an organization like the BBC to a higher standard than that. I know with the onset of blogs and chat, that aspect of language has become lax, but I think that it should be unacceptable with regards in institutions like the BBC, CNN, etc.


I read the article and had no problem. Its interesting how some people find errors in grammar hard to deal with and some don't. Thats not a judgement on you by the way .

Nick Mason