>Is that an excuse?... I hope not... it is published under the Microsoft web site. <

No, Jim, it's not an excuse. I just felt like pointing it out.

~~Bonnie



I'll go check if MS has also included a disclaimer along the lines of 'this is some user's interpretation of the feature described and may not accurately represent the true capabilities of the feature'.
>
>cheers and belated Happy New Year
>
>
>>Guenter,
>>
>>Dino is not an MS employee ...
>>
>>~~Bonnie
>>
>>
>>>Hi all!
>>>Just reading an article by Dino Esposito about the latest twist of data binding in ASP.NET 2 (DataView instead of DataGrid, new DataSource control)
>>>http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/04/08/GridView/
>>>and what do I see?
>>>Figure 2 with data sources SQL-Server and Abszess, ehm, Access via OLE-DB.
>>>That´s what everybody hates so much about VFP MARKETING: VFP is virtually unknown inside MS. Any time you have references to VB, C#, .Net, SS, you-name-it, but no VFP.
>>>Well, Oracle wasn´t mentioned explicitly either, but wasn´t this the other camp?
>>>
>>>The only thing I recently enjoyed was wOOdy´s and other´s mention of VFP on Channel 9, when Anders Hejlsberg spoke about the data(base var type) features they´re planning to intro in the next .Net framework version as the next big thing.
>>>Had to air this.
>>>G