Hi Mike

See the other part of the thread, #060273 (how DO you get message nos to go hyper!?). I wasn't paying attention and my test prog got saved as an .scx or something. Anyway, it was very confusing and, after a day of system converion (major upheavals in the code to rid it of legacy un-normalised flat files and stuff), I was in no mood to pursue it or pay much attention. i didn't mean any offence and, as I'd copied the code tp 2 new progs, and got the same result, i was beginning to think it was an academic exercise in something, but couldn't really care.

Anyway, I like the Dutch, and if I'm out to offend anyone on the forum, it'll be you Yanks! :-)

Nuff said.

Terry

>Hi Terry!
>
>>Is it supposed to just say to me that it doesn't exist? I copied it to a new prod, saved it and then ran it. Then I saved it to another name and it still says the same. So is this an exercise in futility? That's the reason why i didn't run it in the first place!
>
>I'm not sure why you're seeing that message. You know I have disagreements with Walter about "style", but what you don't know is that his code usually works well. It worked for me without a hitch.
>
>I mean you no offence, but I think you're being unfair to him here.