>Still many people tell me VB is better than Vfp. But, if you ask them how much you know about vfp, most of them may say they don't know much because vfp is very hard to learn. When they found problems in writing vfp program, they would say Access could do it easily. Although I told them the way to do the same thing in vfp, they didn't change their mind on vfp(actually, problems were caused by too little vfp knowledge, most of them were very simple.).
>
>Sunny
>
That's basically the problem, but if you look at the success rate of VFP apps against VB, VFP gained a lot of respect because of its Knowledge Base support and maturity of the product, and that's what happening here in our country. An insurance company sued one of the most respected software devt company here because of failure in delivering the product using VB/SQL Server.

>>Hi all,
>>
>>I would appreciate if anyone could supply me the Internet address of Robert Green's 'Choosing the Right Database Development Tool' from Microsoft. We need the said article to strengthen our claim that a VFP/SQL Server is a better combination than VB/SQL Server.
>>
>>If the said article is no longer available, I would appreciate if you could advise me of similar one. TIA