>Hi, Peter.
>
>>About the 'obscure reason'. I assume it is a case for Michel Fournier, but I don't feel a need to ask him about it.
>
>I can't understand that, but I can't understand you jumping in this thread also. If you don't like Fabio using "m." they way it does, then just ignore it. How can you question the way he writes his code (being it a perfect answer for the question)?
Hi Martin,
The 'obscure reason' refers to the fact that two replies to me never have popped up in my Reply section in the Dashboard, for some to me obscure reason. That's all. But again, I don't feel a need to ask him (or you) to investigate it. Now I wonder... why did you react? Why did you jump in? Do you want to join the discussion, or what?
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
