Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Text box tooltip
Message
From
25/01/2005 05:24:09
 
 
To
24/01/2005 20:11:08
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Forms & Form designer
Environment versions
Visual FoxPro:
VFP 7 SP1
OS:
Windows '98
Database:
Visual FoxPro
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00977082
Message ID:
00980313
Views:
57
>Hi Alan,
>
>[snip]
>>
>>Forbidding something that you can't enforce has never worked in the past, so I don't hold out much hope for it in the future. When VFP itself forbids using 'This' as a field or alias name, then you can do as you say, but then again, when that happens, Fabio will be able to drop the 'm.' in front of 'This' with no change at all to his standards.
>
>Goal!.

Hey Fabio, are you the referee here? :)

>>>The standard should incorporate:
>>>- Never create a field with a reserved name like THIS.
>>>- Use the mdot in the right argument, but do not use them in front of reserved words like THIS.
>>
>>>I don't mind that Fabio uses m.this in his own code, although I would not like to read or maintain such code. But I think it's inappropriate that he uses that method here on the UT in his examples. It are the starters who get influenced. And it's a bad influence.
>>>
>>>Maybe we can vote on THIS ...
>>
>>I vote that Microsoft prohibit the use of 'This' as a field or alias name. Then... problem solved.
>
>I add another vote ( and this will have as side effect also one small performance increment )

Also add my vote. So, no disagreement on this one.
Groet,
Peter de Valença

Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform