Thank you Claude.
Would ActiveVFP be a tool that could exploit the advantages of a VFP MTDLL?

And - I just looked at your site - From what I have read here (and other places) - it seems that AVFP is gathering quite a following (congratulations!). I note it is still free. If my project required AVFP, how would you make your end?*g*. I have not drilled down (lately) through the site - but if the project used AVFP - what kind of site lincensing would be required.

Thanks for the link - I am going there now!


>In a word, web. Could you explain what you mean by limited capability? Possibly you mean that it must be called from a multi-threaded client like IIS and not a VFP exe? The VFP mtdll does away with the need to have several vfp .exes in the background servicing multiple web requests which was the old hack to do vfp web programming.
>See this link for more info:
>http://www.calvinhsia.com/papers/AdvancedVFPServers.mht
>
>>Why does VFP offer a [limited] MTDLL capability? What problems were envisioned that MTDLL would help solve?