Hi

Another aspect of firefox I have noticed is that it uses more memory than ie and on my laptop if I allow it to go to sleep with firefox open it takes a lot longer to restart and sometimes hangs altogether. I wonder if anyone else has found that.

Nick Mason

>Tracy;
>
>Some things that bother me about this "report":
>
>1. When was this “report” created?
>2. Time line comparison of IE 6 and Firefox 1.0 for example:
>a. IE 6 2003-2005
>b. FireFox 2003-2005 released in November 2004 with reporting from December and January (which still has a few days left in the month I noticed).
>
>The verbiage also bothers me.
>
>Secunia released advisories for IE 6.0 = 60 during the period of interest. The period is stated as 2003-2004 if you place your cursor over the parenthetical expression (Based upon 60 advisories from 2003 - 2005)
>
>Secunia released advisories for FireFox = 6 during the period of interest with the same inconsistent date range.
>
>I find the report to be of no professional value and consider it to be poorly created. With a background in Science and Engineering I would never accept a report of this nature. The sample period is too short for FireFox to draw any conclusions.
>
>Who proof read the report? I like the sentence, "Secunia's unique corporate culture has been the driving force behind these services and the success". The success of what? We have the definite article with no subject!
>
>Oh well, not everyone cares for accuracy or meaning. It is all about profit! :)
>
>
>Tom
>
>P.S. For kicks cionsider if you will:
>
>IE 6 60 Advisories in 24 months = 2.5/month.
>
>Firefox 1.0 6 Advisories for two months reported = 3.0/month. :)
>
>
>
>
>
>>This is interesting:
>>
>>http://www.myscacc.org/browser_vulnerabilities.htm