I am scanning lots of documents for a client, and somebody suggested to use JPEG 2000 format, instead of JPEG. Now, I understand that these typically take up less space for the same quality; but how about compatibility? For instance, some of these images are destined for distribution on a CD, and they should work in the major browsers. Also, to give another example, some pictures might end up being imported into PowerPoint presentations.
TIA,
Hilmar.
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
