Thank you for the info, I didn't know that. Too bad Microsoft don't publish the known bugs....

>There's also bug in VFP9 that causes Rushmore to ignore any index with STR() function. The workaround is to replace it with PADL().
>
>>To quote Sergey: if CPCURRENT() and CPDBF() don't match, Rushmore will be disabled in VFP9 for such table because the indexes may not match the table data after data's converted to the current code page.
>>
>>>is vfp9 have a index problem. in vfp8 my codes was working will but in vfp9 responcse is very late