>Hi Nadya,
>I do not know MereMortals Framework, but task that is not this the cause.
>To control this bug is not easy, and therefore if it were this, the call to loObject.release() would not have effects.
>
>Task that loObject is locked from some other reference that loObject.release() removes.
>
>The documentation of MereMortals framework says that it is necessary to call loObject.release() or not?
>
>Fabio

I don't think there is any mention about this in Documentation, but I'm going to double check on Tuesday. I'm also going to post in MereMortals category, because I don't think I'm the only one who noticed this behavior.