Can you please rephrase what you really are asking about? In VFP9 a PROBLEM was fixed, which had the consequence that if CPDBF() of a table does not match CPCURRENT(), Rushmore is turned off. This was made to avoid that you got wrong data, which you could get in earlier versions.

>this is my sconed thread on indexing, i see there is no problem in vfp9 beat about indexing.but vfp9 have.
>may be microsoft fix this problem in sp or any update.
>but now how i will countinew work or speady work.
>thanks