Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
CIPHER30... again
Message
 
À
12/05/1998 12:23:53
Criss Jensen
Injury Prevention Research Center
Iowa City, Iowa, États-Unis
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Produits tierce partie
Divers
Thread ID:
00098586
Message ID:
00098947
Vues:
36
>Jose,
>
>The problem here is not so much limiting access to the data for authorized users as it is prohibiting access outside the application. FoxPro tables are easily read by other application (e.g. Excel) and that is what we are trying to prevent. A suggestion was given to me this morning about separating sensitive data out of the main Patient table and linking to it. So I would have a PatientName table, a PatientSSN table and a PatientDemographics table and none of the sensitive data is connected to anything but a key. Might be my best option if I can't encrypt this data. Thanks for the ideas.
>
>Criss

I really like this idea! I don't know if you are using the DBC. But if you don't it's something you might consider. You could limit the users to only see the data from outside (although the VFP ODBC driver is not so common), but totally forbid them to change sensitive information. Suppose goApp is your application object and Validate() a method of it. For some field in your database, the validation rule could be !EMPTY() AND goApp.Validate().

Just a few more ideas...

José
Précédent
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform