>>To see what the "rest of the world" thinks of VFP's c/s capabilities check out
>>an article in DBMS online by Tom Spitzer entitled "Going client/server with
>>VFP" Just go to the "www.dbmsmag.com" site and do a search. If you know VFP
>>really well i say stick with VFP for c/s projects.
>
>Dave, that article has only marginal usability since it is dated February,
>1996. Do you know of anything more recent?

If you are using VFP 3.0 it is useful.
Tom wrote another pretty good article about VFP 5.0 and its client server capabilities. Again just search through DBMS onine and you should find it.
Basically remote views are lousy in either 5.0 or 3.0 ...
All the data from the query of the view has to be loaded onto the client ...
(unless i am missing something here ?)