>I find this to be a bit strange. If the UT list was never taken under consideration by MS Michel should've told us. Then we would've directly contact MS about the bugs. This is by no mean a way to blame Michel. Perhaps he thought that the list would be taken into consideration by MS.
>
>So a possible solution to this could be for the UT to have an agreement with MS that Michel could implement. Something that sends the new bugs mentioned on the UT to MS.
Good plan!!! Michel, are you monitoring this thread?
>That way we'd know that every bug mentioned here would get to MS. Perhaps there's a good reason people post bugs here instead of MS's site. Could it be that the time needed to report here is easier than on MS?
>
>Anyway there must be an easy solution to this.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
