First : I never read it. So my excuses for that
Second : Rules are made to be broken <g>


>Denis,
>
>The following is from the top of the Bug List here and it has ALWAYS been there:
>"This list is not monitored by Microsoft and there is no guarantee that they could become aware of any part of it. This option has been delivered accordingly to the request of our members to help them become aware of some potential anomalies, find workarounds and discuss about them. Anyone can submit a bug directly to Microsoft at their bug submission page.".
>
>cheers
>
>>I find this to be a bit strange. If the UT list was never taken under consideration by MS Michel should've told us. Then we would've directly contact MS about the bugs. This is by no mean a way to blame Michel. Perhaps he thought that the list would be taken into consideration by MS.
>>
>>So a possible solution to this could be for the UT to have an agreement with MS that Michel could implement. Something that sends the new bugs mentioned on the UT to MS.
>>
>>That way we'd know that every bug mentioned here would get to MS. Perhaps there's a good reason people post bugs here instead of MS's site. Could it be that the time needed to report here is easier than on MS?
>>
>>Anyway there must be an easy solution to this.
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>And has the vfpteam ever LOOKED at the list? If yes, when was the last time?
>>>>
>>>>No, and there are no plans to.
>>>
>>>Really?! This surprises me a lot, in a negative sense, so to speak. I expected that the VFPTeam is interested in ALL feedback on bugs, not only in feedback that comes in via email to vfpfeed@. The UT is an important site for vfp, and it is known to you and your team, and if vfpteam members think that it's no big deal to skip the UT bug list, then I regard that as arrogant behavior.
>>>
>>>> The proper way to submit a bug to the VFP team is by going to http://msdn.com/vfoxpro/support.
>>>
>>>I can understand that the vfpteam wants a straight procedure and that vfpfeed@ fits in that procedure. But it is simply impolite that the UT list has not even ever been looked at in the past.