>>>I literally said that VFP is good and VB is good, and nothing else
>
>Once again - incorrect. You stated that if by using VFP - the results would be the same. Sorry, it seems as if this statement was just pulled out. You really need to back that statement up with some facts to support that conclusion.

Facts? Do you want to say that VB is always better, or do you want to say that VFP is always better? I hope at least on this forum we have right (or maybe self-respect) to consider our product as 'valid part of MS Development Tools'. Am i right here, at least? It means that qualified person can provide qualified solution using his/her tool (see that I don't say what tool specifically).
One more thing, usually I make replies here (you can call it conclusions) based on my own experience and I believe you do the same. My experience tells me that VFP can be used to build quality C/S systems just because I really used VFP for this purpose. What other facts would you expect from me?