I see other people getting on (from the iis log) so I'm not sure what the problem is - you might want to clear your cache and try again..
>It is still (or, again) down.
>
>>It should be up. One note though: bookmarked pages may not be a good idea since www.activevfp.com redirects to whatever IP they've assigned me, which could change...
>>>Claude,
>>>Just now you're drawing my attention to your product, your website is down, probably because you're updating it. When will it be up and running again?
>>>
>>>>Some of AVFP(ActiveVFP) is modeled on the original foxweb for ease of use like simply populating the output variable HTML_out for output. However, Foxweb and AFP concentrate on mixing vfp code with html code like classic ASP. This goes against the trend of separating the presentation layer from the application layer. ASP.NET does this separation with "code-behind". AVFP does this by using HTML templates and placing the application code in a vfp mtdll, although it still has the flexibility (as does ASP.NET) of mixing the code directly with the HTML.
>>>>But the biggest difference is the underlying architecture. AVFP uses the much more modern mtdll technology which is a big improvement in efficiency, speed and scalability for vfp web applications while sacrificing nothing as far as ease of use. VFP mtdlls offer true vfp multi-threading(sharing a single vfp runtime) while foxweb, AFP, and wwc only simulate this by running multiple EXE server processes in the background which was the original technology developed in the mid 90s because there was no better way to do vfp web programming at that time...
>>>>>Hello Claude,
>>>>> What about your product? Is it well documented and supported, easy to learn, and have a small learnibng curve as foxweb? Are the products built from the ground up in a similar fashion? What are the greatest differences?
>>>>> What about Active-FoxPro-Pages? Price is always an issue, but quality, documentation, support, easy of use, and learning curves are important too.
>>>>>
>>>>>Bob