Having read your comments I can't say much more than: Let's agree to agree.
With regard to
the dilemma of our world economy were value of money is very skewed I have some wild ideas, but no easy answers here indeed. The scheme I have in mind would be cost-neutral if looked at from a certain perspective, but it is not if looked at from an individual's - or a company's - perspective. The governments act here as mediating bankers who accept loss on one transaction and make profit on another transaction, where in the end it is more or less cost neutral. Consequence would be that a U.S. product (e.g. WWC) is no longer expensive for an Indian, but that Indian products are also no longer cheap for the U.S., causing that certain U.S. prices would go up, making a dollar worth less, whereas a rupee would go up in worth. In the end there would no longer be skewness. But... wild ideas only. However, it might be a major topic in politics within a couple of years.
[snip]
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.