>>Yeah, that seemed to be the next natural question and I thought of asking him that. But Ken has been hammered so much lately I layed off. I probably wouldn't have understood the technical reason behind it anyways. :)
>
>And you would'nt want, because of your interrogations, to be accused of causing trouble to the VFP development.

Nah. I'm too much of a light weight here to cause any problem.
All I was looking for was to refresh my memory of what the reasoning was. That's all. I didn't want to dig up any heated exchange on this subject.

>Imagine I alone almost killed VFP (ROFLMAO) because of my marketing complaints.

We need someone to keep the presure on them.

But those that blast Ken about this isn't being fair. I think Ken is doing his best. He can only work with what he is given. Which says a lot about VFP, that it is such a great tool.