>>>But those that blast Ken about this isn't being fair. I think Ken is doing his best. He can only work with what he is given. Which says a lot about VFP, that it is such a great tool.
>>
>>Sure, Ken is indeed doing a great (and probably very difficult) job, but I believe that MS (probably someone higher up than Ken) does not want to tell the truth about why there is no VFP.NET. I, for one, am not buying the "it is not technically possible", and "doing so would mean that vfp would loose all its great features".
>>
>>Eyvind.
>
>Hi Eyvind.
>
>Perhaps.
>
>But I don't want to go there. We've been there already.

We've been there already. But have we been there enough?