Rod,

>We should not need to make excuses for VFP's sorry ActiveX support.VFP should rise to the level that VB does not vise versa.

I'm not making exuses for VFP. I'm just restating what I have read here and other places and was under the impression that this statement came from M$. Not that this makes it gospel and the statement could be wrong but I haven't heard anything *factual* to dispell this.

>I'll give you an example: Try popping up a Modal VFP form over some ActiveX controls (MapObjects for example). Doesn't work does it. So is this the fault of the >ActiveX control of VFP's implementation.

Well, you asked the question, but how can you argue the statement if you can't supply the answer yourself?

>The trouble is that VFP does not support AX controls the same way VB does. Hey isn't this the same company ???

I believe I made this point already.


Since there is no tone in written word I should state that this isn't directed personally at you (I can see myself while re-reading it how it could be read that way).


Cheers