Denis,

I'm not sure when you became a .Net expert. But I did attend a presentation on VS 2005 several months ago. The presenter made perfect sense to me when he discussed how the requirements for VS 2003 were to create a stable product, with not too much room for creativity. And that for VS 2005 the 2 teams were presented with a list of requirements for the next release. And each team could come up with their own enhancements beyound that list.

He then went on to show some of the different features that were added to each language. I would expect the differences to become more significant as time goes on.

>>I never said it was impossible. I simply stated what Microosoft plans are. There is no benefit to developers to have yet another .NET language to choose from if the same features will basically exist in VB.NET and C#. Creating a VFP.NET language would take away resources from adding VFP like features to the .NET languages.
>
>You're right it makes a lot of sense. There are a lot of differences between vb.net and C#.