>>>All versions of VFP could mean that it's been a while since there's been a new version for it. don't you think is should be
>>>
>>>VFP 9 and before
>>
>>What about it? I actually don't see a problem here, since half of the VFP community uses a version of FoxPro earlier than 8.0. This feedback should be given to those who hosted the event and creatd that list, not to me. Although I see no problem with it, there is no real issue here.
>
>I attended the same event. Personally I think it was great that FoxPro was on the form. I credit your efforts inside of Microsoft for that happening.

Nice but still perhaps some efforts are necessary.

Is the glass half full of half empty?

So you don't think that mentioning the latest version of VFP could be even better. Unless you're so deep in .Net development that you (too) don't really care anymore about what happens with VFP?