>Yes, that is something that is highlighted (listed) on the back of the box or in the main feature list. Something that would be listed on the overview page, see
http://msdn.microsoft.com/vfoxpro/productinfo/overview/default.aspx.
Well, I think the real MS "strategy" for VFP is that it should not cannibalize .NET.
I have a few questions for you:
[1] Is there an effort within MS to encourage VFP developers to learn .NET with hopes that, one day, VFP development will cease. A simple YES or NO answer is required here.
[2] If YES is answered above, then the question is why? Please don't say that MS does not have the resources to continue VFP development - that answer is unacceptable.
[3] Is it true that .NET development is not being embraced by development communities as planned? Is this the reason for [1] above?
[4] Can you honestly say that the costs associated with developing a database application with VB.NET will be comparable to the costs developing the same application with VFP?
I hope that you will not dance around these questions, but give us some straight forward answers.
- Jeff