Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Strong vs weak typing
Message
De
17/03/2005 11:21:45
Cetin Basoz
Engineerica Inc.
Izmir, Turquie
 
 
À
17/03/2005 11:19:04
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Autre
Divers
Thread ID:
00996662
Message ID:
00996863
Vues:
28
>>>>Hi kev,
>>>>
>>>>>I agree with everything you said except
>>>>>
>>>>>>3. I have not heard about this. I find VFP's intellisense just as good as C#'s intellisense.
>>>>>
>>>>>The main difference I find is that .Net's intellisense will work for not only .Net classes but custom classes also, this is a great addition, especially in a heavy OO environment where you have a mass of classes.
>>>>>
>>>>>Unless I am wrong and you "can" in fact declare custom class type variables in VFP.
>>>>
>>>>Indeed you can declare custom class type variables in VFP. eg:
>>>>
>>>>
LOCAL x AS Myclass OF Myclasslib
>>>
>>>Yes but intellisense won't pick that up.
>>>
>>>Kev
>>
>>Hmm picking for me as it does in .Net
>
>Oh yeah, so it does, my mistake.
>
>How about properties? Can you do the same for them?
>
>Kev

What do you mean? x.myProperty? Yes it lists all PEM.
PS: I found strong typing of .Net more than needed (redundant rock typing).
Cetin
Çetin Basöz

The way to Go
Flutter - For mobile, web and desktop.
World's most advanced open source relational database.
.Net for foxheads - Blog (main)
FoxSharp - Blog (mirror)
Welcome to FoxyClasses

LinqPad - C#,VB,F#,SQL,eSQL ... scratchpad
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform