>Exactly. The key point here is intent. Yes they had to decide on a design limit.
Hmmm, but without further information there are mighty grey areas. Think in the possibility of running vfp8 (IDE and runtime) under NT4 after copying gdiplus dlls. I can understand MS wanting to save testing for an OS declared "not supported", but would that be a "intended technical limitation" that could be forbidden with wording such as in the new EULA ?
The wording is quite logical, very encompassing and could touch a lot of things. I hope that such wording will only lead to more isuues be deemed unlawful or not be included in the license - which happened to some MS clauses forbidding resale of MS products in germany. But before I consult a lawyer before buying software, I would just buy/get another alternative <g>
my 0.02 EUR
thomas
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only