>>>I literally said that VFP is good and VB is good, and nothing else
>
>Once again - incorrect. You stated that if by using VFP - the results would be the same. Sorry, it seems as if this statement was just pulled out. You really need to back that statement up with some facts to support that conclusion.

The results would probably be the same. It's the time spent that would probably be grossly different :)

Just an opinion. No data to back me up. Theoretically, it's even possible that VFP attracts quicker programmers even though it's not actually a better RAD tool than VB, or vice versa. I don't trust statistics that much - it doesn't help you for any particular case.