>>I think it's a pretty safe bet that there HAS to be a SP for VFP9.
>>
>
>Jim,
>
>would you care to elaborate on this? Are there any specific issues you have in mind?
I've seen a few reported that seem troublesome to me.
Two that come to mind are:
1) Increased number of 2065 errors, specifically on .TMP files apparently having view data in them;
2) SQL Select that seems not to 'find' a table that is already opened.
cheers
>
>Eyvind.
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only