Information générale
Catégorie:
The Mere Mortals .NET Framework
Versions des environnements
Network:
Windows 2000 Server
Kevin,
I uninstalled MM.Net 1.3, verified that all the related assemblies were gone, then re-installed version 1.3. I have noticed that the version of the assemblies after I did that still started with 1.1... , so I don't know if that would be OK.
Then I tried to rebuild the C# application, and still got errors (fewer though). As a matter of fact I got 5 errors:
1) C:\Program Files\Mere Mortals .NET Framework 2003\Samples\MM Northwind Sample Application_CSharp\licenses.licx Could not transform licenses file 'licenses.licx' into a binary resource. (1) : error LC0003 : Unabled to resolve type 'Infragistics.Win.UltraWinEditors.UltraOptionSet, Infragistics.Win.UltraWinEditors.v4.3, Version=4.3.20043.27, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=7dd5c3163f2cd0cb'
2) C:\Program Files\Mere Mortals .NET Framework 2003\Samples\MM Northwind Sample Application_CSharp\EmployeeForm.cs(43): Field 'OakLeaf.MM.NorthwindSample.Main.Windows.Forms.EmployeeForm.components' is never assigned to, and will always have its default value null
3) C:\Program Files\Mere Mortals .NET Framework 2003\Samples\MM Northwind Sample Business Objects_CSharp\OrderDefaultValues.cs(19): Parameter 'customerID' has no matching param tag in XML comment (but other parameters do)
4) C:\Program Files\Mere Mortals .NET Framework 2003\Samples\MM Northwind Sample Application_CSharp\EmployeeForm.cs(43): The keyword new is required on 'OakLeaf.MM.NorthwindSample.Main.Windows.Forms.EmployeeForm.components' because it hides inherited member 'OakLeaf.MM.Main.Windows.Forms.mmMaintenanceForm.components'
5) C:\Program Files\Mere Mortals .NET Framework 2003\Samples\MM Northwind Sample Business Objects_CSharp\OrderDefaultValues.cs(18): XML comment on 'OakLeaf.MM.NorthwindSample.Main.Business.OrderDefaultValues.OrderDefaultValues(string)' has a param tag for 'orderID', but there is no parameter by that name
Do you think that this is still related to my installation ?
Thanks,
Antonio Lozada
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement