May be it was not a pigeon, but a chicken? Now, if I'm right, why this is important? Perhaps it was not an ordinary chicken...

>>From earlier:
>>
>>>Was the taste of the bird relevant?
>>
>>You said:
>>Yes.
>>
>>You have said the bird tasted like chicken.
>>
>
>Sorry about that one. That was a joki.
>
>>Now:
>>>>Is the fact that it did taste like chicken relevant?
>>>
>
>No.
>
>>>The answer to the first question above, and this is important, is no.
>>
>>Did the bird taste like chicken *and* something else?
>>
>>Am I confused? :)
>
>
>The two important questions are: to erase confusion.
>
>1. Is the taste of the bird important? Yes.
>
>2. Has this person have ever tasted pigeion? No.
>
>Now you have to start asking about what happened on that deserted island.