As I indicated before, my only intent in my postings about this was to let you and others know that you were incorrect in your assumption that Microsoft marketing had reviewed the SD Times blurb about VFP 9.0 before it went to print, which was not the case. There have been a few cases where you made assumptions on how Microsoft works internally. I was not referring to any other topic other than about assumptions on how Microsoft works internally. This should clarify and end the discussion.